\”Even if the appellate court is inclined to re-evaluate and re-appreciate evidence on record to take a different approach, such interference is not justified when the trial court\’s view is a possible view, not marred with perversity or unreasonableness and thus, the appellate Courts must exercise a great deal of caution before disturbing the factual findings recorded by the trial court, Bombay High Court has held.\”
Judgment: State of Maharashtra v. Gulab Dattu Patil & Ors.
Source: www.livelaw.in